What’s the story with raths?

About a rath

Anyone who grew up in rural Ireland and many who grew up in the towns and cities know something of our raths. Some are quite large like the one in Dunmore you see in the picture above. You may have heard of them called fairy forts, ring forts, or fairy raths. They vary quite a bit in structure from small innocuous looking clumps of trees up to large moated rings with underground channels or souterrains. The experts classify them as ring forts, hill forts, enclosures and general raths. They are amongst the most common field monuments in Ireland. A clue is provided in the fact that so many placenames begin with Rath… Others, such as Laragh, where I come from, also refer. Laragh was originally Leath Rath or half rath.

Over sixty thousand of them survive. Many others have been levelled.

On my own farm in Kilkenny a very large rath was levelled by a previous owner in the 1960′s. All that remains of it is the circular ring of different growth betraying where the enclosure ditch was filled in. Only one of three raths that were marked on an 1860′s ordinance survey map of our area, still exists. It was on top of a small hill and is similar in proportions to a hill fort in South Kilkenny that was excavated by archeologists and deemed to be an enclosure from the Bronze age.

This is typical of the situation around the country. Even in recent times when people ought to have known better, raths have been levelled.

Who lived in the raths?

It depends on who you ask.

What the archaeologists say

The archaeologists and historians tell us that most raths were enclosures in which a fine (extended family or sub-clan) lived. The perimeter in many cases would have been a moat, a stone wall or a thorny fence, depending on whether your land grew hedges or grew stones! Inside the perimeter the homes of the families were built. There were also shelters for animals, kilns for drying grain, religious and burial structures and in some there were ‘souterrains’ or underground chambers. Some animals would have been brought in for milking or to protect at night from wolves and robbers. Most building in Ireland back then was of timber so little evidence survives of these homesteads other than traces of poles in the ground. Outside the perimeter were fields that were allocated to various members of the fine to use. The allocation of such land was done according to very ancient and complex Brehon law (more on that soon).

What the people say

The people of the country however had a different explanation than the archaeologists. They believed that the rath is the home of the little people or the good people. I never heard them referred to directly as fairies – and wonder whether this name was imported in recent centuries. And people were always afraid of offending the little people because they could do a lot of unpleasant things when riled. More on this another day.

What the ancient books say

One possible explanation for the belief that the rath belongs to people with magical powers and who are quick to take a grudge, is found in the Labor Gabala or the book of invasions. This is one of several manuscripts written by monks many centuries ago. The books are generally regarded as containing the first written recordings of the knowledge passed down by countless generations of poets and scholars – though the monks naturally may have put their own spin on some of the material. This particular book sets out a history of a wave of invasions of Ireland. I will come back to this. What is relevant here from the Labor Gabala is that it says that one of the previous peoples of Ireland were the Tuatha Dé Danann. The Dé Danann were defeated by our ancestors, the Milesians. (Scientists have a different take on this. But just as interesting. Oh dear, another thing I have to come back to later.) In the truce that followed, the Dé Danann were relegated to the underworld and the big people took most of the visible countryside. The raths are the only visible portals to the magical world of the Tuatha Dé Danann, who became known to us as the little people or the fairies. You can imagine why such a people, truce or no truce, might take umbrage at any intrusion on a rath!

That is, the raths became the homes of the fairies, people who did nobody any harm as long as you left them alone; people who on the other hand could do you a great deal of harm if you interfered with one of them or did damage to their homes, the raths or fairy forts.

There are many people in the country who have heard music or seen lights at night coming from a rath. There are many young people as well as old who will not ever harm even a branch of a tree in a rath because they do not want to upset the balance.

How old are raths?

The common view is that most raths were constructed between the 5th and the 9th century. However, relatively few have been excavated by archeologists and this is therefore not an established fact. Some ring forts that have been excavated have revealed Bronze Age as well as Iron Age and stone artefacts. From this and from the fact that raths vary considerably in size, shape, and layout, it is possible they were created in various eras and some may have been adapted and changed over several eras. It’s conceivable that some were first formed not long after people first came here about nine thousand years ago. The truth is that there are probably as many answers are there are raths. The very fine ring fort in the picture below is also in County Kilkenny and is a credit to the land owners as there is no evidence of any interference over recent decades.

What protection is there for raths?

In times past no protection was needed other than that bestowed by fairies and púcas. Many people still fear that if they went too near a rath with an excavator or cut branches from a rath, they would be followed to an early grave by bad luck.

There is something else – another protection that the raths secretly enjoyed. They were unofficial burial grounds of babies. Until recently, a rule of the Catholic Church was that an unbaptized person could not be buried in ‘consecrated ground’. What this meant was that babies who died before they could be baptized could not be buried in their family plots in the local graveyard. This cruel law meant that many silently grieving families had to find some other place to bury the beloved child. Some sneaked into the graveyard at night and buried their children in the family plot regardless of what the priests had said. Others buried babies in old church grounds. Many however went to the nearest rath. If the modern God would not accept their little ones, the ancient Gods would accept them. Babies buried in raths were thought to be protected by the fairies. And it was assumed that nobody would ever disturb the graves of these little people.

I think that farmers who level raths probably do so in ignorance rather than simply out of greed for more land. If younger farmers were reminded about the heritage and history, not to speak of the bodies of babies, few would dream of damaging a rath. Of course you can’t always rely on good will. You need laws too.

In recent years the raths have finally gained legal protection. County by county, inventories of archaeological sites have been taken in the past ten years. You can see these catalogued in an interactive map that details the monuments in every townland in the country. This is a brilliant tool and well worth a look. You’ll find it at http://webgis.archaeology.ie/NationalMonuments/FlexViewer/ 

Raths are listed in these inventories (along with other precious heritage sites such as fulachta fiadh, souterrains, and megalithic sites). That means they are now protected under the Monuments Act of 1930. It is now a serious criminal offence to damage a rath. Only last week the first prosecution under this legislation saw a Kerry farmer heavily fined for destroying a ring fort.

In the image above you see the circular outline of what may have been a fulacht fian. Also interesting in this image of bogland is the ridges. They are often called famine ridges. Before the great famine the land was so densely populated that even poor bogland like this was tilled for growing potatoes. Because the land is so poor, it has never been ploughed since – with the consequence of providing us a sad reminder of a population almost wiped off the face of the earth.

Farmers who own the land on which a rath is situated must come to see themselves as their ancestors did – not as owners of the rath but as privileged custodians and protectors of these monuments. They must be guardians of the peace, and ensue that we keep the truce with Tuatha Dé Danann.

About fionnfolk
My stories are all nearly true.

9 Responses to What’s the story with raths?

  1. John O'Neill says:

    Tom, lovely stuff! Thanks. But what is “fulachta fiadh”?. It’s got to be a modern invention if I never heard of it.
    Myths – If I am to believe the gospel truth of the Milesians (and I admit it makes sense) what am I to do with the Judaic Old Testament? I recently read a lot about the myths of the ancient near-east, Sumer to Assyria to Palestine. Having confirmed the connections which clearly negated the self-proclaimed one chosen people, must I now pay much more serious heed to the prophets and rabbis who knew for certain which to select or reject.
    I will tell grand-daughter Sarah she is just going home when she goes to live in Spain!

    • fionnfolk says:

      Thanks John. I should have explained the fulachta fiadh.

      All that appears of them today is roughly circular indents. The ones I’ve seen are under three metres in diameter. Originally most were lined with stone or impermeable clay. The theory is that they were communal cooking places. They would be filled with water. (They are mostly very near rivers.) In a large fire lit next to the fulacht fian, stones were reddened and then rolled into the water to bring it to the boil. Meat was thus cooked in the water. Evidence for this theory is provided by the burnt stones usually found in the vicinity. I believe people have recreated such structures to show that this system of cooking would have worked. The only moment of doubt I had on the matter was on seeing pictures of strikingly similar structures in Africa. There, the usage is much more straight forward. The submerged pit simply provides a stable place in which to manage a fire for roasting meat over. Having a contrarian bent, I rather fancy this theory. It seems a less laborious method – though of course we are not renowned for always doing things the easiest way. It removes the problem of hot water seeping away. From this perspective, might the point about the fulachta fiach being found near rivers be explained by the fact that many of the early habitations stemmed out from river banks? One could imagine that for a communal event, people would move along the water arteries to meet, rather than navigating through woodlands. And the charred stones? Well the stones around any open fire would be charred.

      And of course, leaping wildly over forty thousand years, we all came from Africa, Milesians, Sumerians, and prophets!

      The genetics studies are not doing much for the theories of chosen people(s) by the way. Like most every other Nation, it’s transpiring that the Jewish Nation is pretty much an amalgamation with appropriated cultural trappings and adaptations tacked on – in the same pragmatic manner that any tribe intent on survival operated.

      Tell Sarah that it seems the Galicians and the Basques are the most closely related to us. So if she wants to meet level headed people, she should steer further South.

      • John O'Neill says:

        I love harassing opinionated authors. Wot’s a fulachta? and is it fiadh, fiach, fian? Might make a differ. But seriously, if these holes in the ground were up to 3 metres wide they must have boiled an elk. How about we are cousins of the Finns or Japanese? They were a sauna, badly needed for exiled Spaniards in an Irish winter. I kind of like the idea of Fionn Mac sitting up to his neck in queens and calling on a serf – roll another stone in here, man or I’ll kick you all the way to Scotland.

  2. fionnfolk says:

    You’ve prmpted me to do an overdue post on the fulachta which I realize I now need to update with the origins of the words themselves; I must say though, the sauna for freezing Spaniards is a far better theory than any I’ve dreamt up!

    • John O'Neill says:

      Give or take a thousand years, were we just emerging from the Ice Age? Gotta be a sauna. My guess is that they were riddled with arthritis and no better remedy. Just read of a dig in Syria which established the women had displaced toes, knees from hours of kneeling at the grindstones. Then the Christians came and told them to kneel down again!

      • fionnfolk says:

        We had been through a bit of a cold snap not that long before, right enough. But men were hardier back then and not given to complaining about a little bit of lumbago.

  3. John O'Neill says:

    Enough theorizing! Get out the digger, make a hole, build the bonfire, invite the neighbours to bring the beer, post the event in the Journal of Irish Archaeology. Done.

    • fionnfolk says:

      I need very little excuse to go digging but I know it would definitely work in the ground here. We have very heavy clay with almost no drainage – to the extent that running to the top of the hills behind us, right in the heart of County Kilkenny, there are extensive bogs like you might expect only to see in Roscommon. Where I’m pretty sure it wouldn’t work is in well drained land – such as the lands that the children of the cromlech hail from. I don’t believe any amount of patching with stones etc would keep water in a pit in by the banks of the Slaney fron Aghade to Tullow for example. Perhaps they only selected heavy water logged sites. Now that would make an interesting study: to look at the correlation between soil type permeability and the locations of the known fulachta fiadh. One for some eager young archaeology Masters student perhaps.

      • John O'Neill says:

        Gottabe heaps of bones around the boiling pits, no?
        Hey, on another tack, see Jim Flynn’s The Torchlight List : Around the World in 200 Books. A fascinating guide to worldwide intelligent fiction.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: